The only major omission is mackie s failure to address logical inconsistencies in god s supposed attributes, other than the problem of. The miracle of theism is not what mackie is espousing here. But the theist is not prepared to affirm any of those things. Mackies definition of the problem the problem of evil is god is omnipotent, god is wholly good, and yet evil exists. Nov 08, 1990 the problem of evil is one of the most discussed topics in the philosophy of religion. In his bestselling book when bad things happen to good people, rabbi. Apr 22, 2016 a problem i see is that even in mackie s world, where every agent makes the morally best choice and takes the morally best action, the problem of evil still arises. His discussion of each is intended to make clear the reasons for which they fail to address the real problem.
Mackies, evil and omnipotence and other kinds of academic papers in our essays database at many essays. But in order for mackies logical argument from evil to work, 5 must be certain. One of the points made by the book of job in the bible is that such is not the case. My view of the problem of evil in mackies article evil and. Aug 20, 2019 john mackies argument on the problem of evil john mackie was best known for his arguments about right and wrong as presented in both philosophy and religion. Moral evil and leibnizs formmatter defense of divine omnipotence. This volume fills that need, offering the most uptodate collection of recent scholarship on the problem of evil. Mackie tried to describe the different possibilities that would have occurred if good and evil existed in the same realm. In that book he granted that a god and some evil could coexist. The problem of evil oxford readings in philosophy 1st. A case against god, but goes into a bit more detail, philosophically speaking. Mackies purpose is to examine the apparent paradox of evil and omnipotence.
From the beginning of mackie s arguement, reason is something that is suspended to sustain belief. Chung phi 2011 2 march 2006 the problem of evil to some evil is necessary for. Mackies evil and omnipotence essay 1652 words 7 pages. The problem of evil is one of the most discussed topics in the philosophy of religion. Contrary to current mythology, however, its failure was not established by alvin plantingas free. John mackie and alvin plantinga arguments on the problem of. A nd it is a logical problem, th e problem of clarifying an d reconciling a num ber of beliefs. The book will no doubt supply much grist for the mill of future discussions, but in this piece i should like to focus on mackies analysis of one particular argument, the kalam cosmological argument. Recent work on the problem of evil analysis oxford. In god and other minds, in the nature of necessity, and in god, freedom, and evil, for example, plantinga, starting out from an examination of john l.
Mackies essay evil and omnipotence 1955, in which mackie had defended an incompatibility version of the argument from evil, focuses mainly on the question of whether the existence of. His analysis was presented by the following facts for a syllogism or formula. The doctrine of god and the philosophical problem of evil. Logical problem of evil internet encyclopedia of philosophy. I then considered three common theological responses to the problem of evil and attempted to provide several objections to them in turn. Analysis of j l mackie s evil and omnipotence free essays. L mackie utilizes philosophical analysis to address the problem of evil. Mackie authors and essay entitled, evil and omnipotence. This contradiction is made apparent as mackie explains that if any two of the propositions are held to. Contrary to current mythology, however, its failure was not established by alvin plantinga s free. First, i introduced the general problem of evil and then provided two wellknown formulations of it mackies logical poe and rowes evidential poe.
For his discussion at this point seems to me to be superficial, and i think it can be shown that he has failed to provide any compelling or even. It has been revised and republished as chapter 9 of mackies book. My belief follows more along the lines of the theodicy defense put forth by john hick in philosophy. One version of this problem includes animal suffering from natural evil, such as the violence and fear faced by animals from predators, natural disasters, over the history of evolution. Mackie and mccloskey can be understood as claiming that it is impossible for all of the. The problem of evil, in th e sense in w hich i shall be using th e phrase, is a problem only for someone w ho believes th at there is a g od w ho is both om nipotent an d w holly good. For this reason, mackie does not think that they are of any help to the theologian trying to respond to the problem of evil. Mackie uses the problem of evil to show that belief in an all good god is irrational. In 1955 he published evil and omnipotence which summarized his view that belief in the existence of evil and an allpowerful, allknowing and allgood god be positively irrational. The problem of evil has also been extended beyond human suffering, to include suffering of animals from cruelty, disease and evil. The philosophical problem of evil is the challenge of reconciling belief in god with evil in the world. The case against god, but also far more systematic. According to my high school ethic class text book, oriental humanism is a.
And yet evil 2 plainly exists, and indeed most theists in other contexts stress its existence more than that of evil 1. Damn that evil the problem of evil is an issue that is entirely too overlooked and dismissed by most christians. Jan 08, 2017 welcome to episode 10 part i of iii on the problem of evil. In section a, mackie outlines the adequate solutions offered by some religious thinkers. He has drawn attention to the fact that all the solutions to the problem involve surrendering one of the definitions of god his omnipotence or his goodness. For some time, however, there has been a need for a collection of readings that adequately represents recent and ongoing writing on the topic. In a widely discussed piece entitled evil and omnipotence john mackie repeats this claim. Mr mackie does an above average job of introducing arguments for the existence of god. I think one of the best questions that you could ask is, why does god allow evil being a perfect and loving god elwell, pg 4 there are different types of evil that are allowed in this world. Omnipotent means allpowerful and that god is capable of anything. He uses the standpoint that god cannot be omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and evil can still exist.
Even the book of proverbs, despite its occasional flashes of cynicism, essentially. Even the freewill defence fails because an omnipotent god should be able to create free creatures who do not choose evil. Mar 12, 2007 peter van inwagens the problem of evil is a fairly short book, but only about half of it is devoted to his answer to the problem of evil. This definition is so vague so changing its meaning also makes nonsense. The year 1996 was a watershed year in the study of the problem of evil with the publication of the evidential problem of evil. Mackies evil and omnipotence essay 1652 words bartleby. Mackie s version of the logical problem of evil is a failure, as even he came to recognize. Problem of evil proves belief in god irrational not just nonrational a. The problem of evil to present the topic of the problem with evil, without acknowledging there is a god can be confusing. Read this philosophy essay and over 89,000 other research documents. Human choice and free will posted on december 19, 20 by russia robinson in his article entitled evil and omnipotence, j. Reconstructed, mackies argument from evil goes as follows. We should, therefore, state the problem of evil in terms of second order evil, and against this form of the problem the present solution is useless. Mackie wrote a very convincing piece on the problem of evil called evil and omnipotence, in which he attempts to show that one of the following premises must be false in order for them to be consistent with each other.
Episode 10, the problem of evil part i the panpsycast. The problem of evil according to mackie and the efficacy of. Mackie 3 but insofar as one tries to solve the problem of evil by stressing the importance or value of second order good in counterbalancing the existence of first order evil, one falls prey to what mackie calls a fatal objectionthe existence of second order evil like indifference. Mackie states the problem of evil, as a contradiction between the propositions god is omnipotent. Mackie argues that if an omnipotent and morally perfect god exists, why then is there so much evil in this world. I am going to reply to the mackies version of the problem of evil solution. The problem of evil, in the sense in which i shall be using the phrase, is a problem only for someone who believes that there is a god who is.
Although he admits that these solutions work up to a point, mackie describes them as halfhearted because, he argues, they dont take the idea of evil seriously enough. We will explore this view in this essay, but first, let us briefly look at the basic foundation for mackies arguments. When problems are found with proofs for gods existence, believers can claim that god is known in some other, nonrational way. Mackie has stated the logical problem of evil in very lucid terms. Some chapters are easier than others for the layman to understand.
Mackie thinks these solutions all fail because they only appear to be retaining the three main propositions of the problem of evil gods omnipotence, gods. Mackies evil and omnipotence, he argues against the existence of god. Sep 12, 2009 thus the problem of evil is reduced to the theodicity that this is the best of all possible worlds a quiteliterally ridiculous statement, but not a selfcontradicting one. Mackie on the problem of evil university of notre dame. The problem of evil stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. In 1955 he published evil and omnipotence which summarized his view that belief in the existence of evil and an allpowerful, allknowing and allgood god was positively irrational. Mackies version of the logical problem of evil is a failure, as even he came to.
Firstly there is evil that does not originate from the choices and actions of moral agents, such as natural evils disasters, diseases, accidents, etc. After weeks of exploring the existence of nature of god, today hank explores one of the biggest problems in theism, and possibly the biggest philosophical question. Mackie agrees that the problem for the theist can be solved by giving up one of the three propositions. However, he thinks most theists will be unwilling to take this approach. That means that believing in e and believing in god is like believing in a fivesided square. In this first instalment we focus on mackie s logical problem and rowe s evidential problem. In this article, mackie comes to the logical conclusion to the existence of god.